Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘works’ Category

This article will appear in the Spectator magazine dated October 17th

Someone somewhere recently asked me in a public forum whether I would prefer to be a singer, the conductor or a member of the audience at the concerts we give. He himself was of the opinion that he would rather be a singer, saying that the music we do is so complicated that only someone on the inside of it can appreciate exactly what the composer has achieved. If he’s right, the audience don’t stand a chance.

I rushed to my own defence, saying that the guy out front has the best of all worlds, as one would expect if he is to control the performance. He is receiving the sound without distortion, so placed that the voices will come to him equally strongly. With this immediacy he can draw out and shape the phrases, which is both a privilege and a pleasure with music of such quality. In fact I have always opted to stand as close to the singers as possible, believing that only when I can virtually touch them will I have real control over the ensemble. When there is some impediment to this – a microphone or some steps or a piece of furniture in a church – and I am obliged to stand back, I never feel so confident about the end result. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Phillips on Cardus

The following book review will appear in the autumn issue of the Musical Times.

Cardus – Celebrant of Beauty  A Memoir by Robin Daniels

The Elusive Mr Cardus  Letters and Other writings edited by Bob Hilton

Neville Cardus has been a hero for many people for a long time now. From his deprived upbringing in the back streets of Manchester (his aunt was a prostitute); to his way with words which, Palestrina-like, seemed to be in an idiom perfectly formed from birth; to his two intriguingly contrasted yet somehow mutually supporting areas of expertise, he fascinated his contemporaries and continues to dazzle the likes of me, who once, in the pages of the Spectator in 1989, tried to write both the music and cricket columns in conscious emulation. There never was a shortage of people to pay him homage, and here, in Robin Daniels’ memoir, must be the last word in this hero worship. One can only hope so.

What was it about Neville which was so impressive? Whatever it was seemed to work for him from an early age since the Manchester Guardian, under the editorship of C.P.Scott (the All-Father as Cardus later called him), most uncharacteristically took a punt on someone who was just 28 and almost completely untried. I suspect it was a combination of the most intense underlying seriousness of purpose, a ready wit, and no obvious interest in wordly possessions. He disarmed people from the first meeting, and backed up the good impression with prose which in itself could seduce. Michael Kennedy put it best: ‘He had a flair for the telling phrase which caught the fleeting moment and gave it permanence’. And the fact that he could do this in the world of classical music and opera – a world every educated person aspired to – as well as with a mere sport – as his musical friends would put it – meant that he had an appeal across two borders. It was typical of his adroitness that in his hands they could seem linked, each giving perspective to the other. It also meant he could be photographed with desirable international stars like Bruno Walter and Otto Klemperer, as well as with national icons like Jack Hobbs. It was a unique double-act. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Out of harmony

The current exhibition at the Tate Modern (‘Rodchenko and Popova: Defining Constructivism’, until 17 May) is rich in cultural reference, apart from any reference to music. Here we have Popova collaborating with theatrical producers and designers, Rodchenko working alongside film-makers and poets (especially Mayakovsky), and everyone in a headlong dash away from easel work towards sculpture, and even architecture. It was a time of quite glorious redefinition of life and culture, taking in anything and everthing. Why is music kept apart?

It wasn’t that the musicians themselves were silent. The new Soviet authorities had a liking for opera, hoping that such an obvious art-form would appeal to the masses. Well-known operas were ridiculously recast with new libretti. Tosca, for example, with the action shifted to Paris in 1871, became The Battle for the Commune; Les Huguenots became The Decembrists (after the early 19th-century revolutionary movement); and Glinka’s A Life for the Tsar was reworked as Hammer and Sickle. At the same time composers were encouraged to explore modes of expression compatible with the prevailing revolutionary mood. Thus the new generation of Russian composers – amongst them Kabalevsky, Shaporin, Shebalin, Myaskovsky and Shostakovich – found themselves composing ‘Hymns to Lenin’ and programmatic symphonies on the problems of the steel industry. (more…)

Read Full Post »

Someone needs to write a history of vibrato. Clearly this should be Roger Norrington: to judge from his words on Radio Three recently he has given the topic much thought and come up with some historically-based conclusions. I suspect he isn’t going to do it though because, like me, he is too busy chiselling out a new -ism on the back of his research, by which he hopes to effect yet another revolution in performance practice.

But the bare bones of the story are straightforward enough. Vibrato, both in orchestral playing and in singing, became acceptable in classical music-making no earlier than 1920. It had existed before this in more vulgar circumstances, but was resisted at the most serious level as being a cheap trick. Part of the written history I am proposing would examine just how something that was once derided could so rapidly became all the rage. There must be many modern parallels here: in styles of clothing, in habits of speech, in modes of eating. One year no-one would be seen dead wearing those clothes or speaking like that or resorting to fast food; the next year it is not only acceptable but perfectly normal, yet another aspect of contemporary living. So it seems to have been with vibrato. One year the music-hall; the next year (or so) the symphony hall and the opera house.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

The following article appeared in The Times of London on the 9th April, as part of a series of articles dedicated to Holy Week. To see it in its original form visit www.timesonline.co.uk and type in my name. It appears under the title quoted above.

The best sacred music is inherently dramatic. The drama may not be of the stagey kind, with tearful lovers and murderous villains. It is more likely to deal in joyfulness (at Christmas and Easter) or penitence (in Lent) or just in a contemplative mood. These may not sound as if they offer much scope for up-to-date drama, yet there is little in opera to rival the atmosphere that a great composer can generate during, for example, a setting of the Requiem Mass. From the light eternal that will shine on us after death, to the day of wrath when the Earth will dissolve into ashes, to the trumpet that will raise the dead from their tombs, to being led into Paradise by angels (maybe), the run of excitements can be irresistible. Verdi himself didn’t miss a trick when it came to this, though my favourite is the wonderful balance which a polyphonic composer such as Victoria can strike between contemplation and sheer terror.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Now that the Allegri Miserere season is fully launched – the text is suitable for Lent – it seems fitting to ask why every choir in the land thinks it incumbent on them to sing this piece of music, for 150 years only ever sung within the walls of the Sistine Chapel. It never used to be so. The local cathedral choir might periodically have had a go at it – and St John’s Cambridge always broadcast it on Ash Wednesday – but nowadays performances by secular and liturgical choirs alike have reached epidemic proportions, a kind of top C fever. This is all the stranger when one reflects that most of these choirs will sing much worse than usual in attempting it. Why bother?

(more…)

Read Full Post »

People make assumptions about how other people think, and then influence the zeitgeist by broadcasting their findings. There is a circularity to this rule of thumb which is ultimately sterile, but which takes some deconstructing. One of the current such verities is that sacred music in worship is of no wide cultural relevance, either because it’s too clever and boring (polyphony), or too stupid and boring (folk masses): anyway it can be of no interest to anyone except fanatics.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

As calling cards go, renaissance polyphony would not seem to promise a ticket to anywhere much, unless to heaven. When I started giving concerts in 1973 the received wisdom on the subject, even in the UK, was that whole concerts of it would never draw an audience. How true that was. But slowly perceptions have changed, and not only in the UK. With something of a crescendo, the opportunities to conduct this repertoire have multiplied, taking me to some very unlikely places. So far as Africa goes I had previously only worked in Fez and Cairo; never in any of the sub-Saharan countries. Last week Byrd’s Mass for Four Voices was heard in concert – I assume for the first time – in Lusaka, Zambia.

It was sung by Vox Zambezi, a chamber choir of 14 singers organised by Paul Kelly, the only white member of the group. All the others come from a church choir based in the New Apostolic Church in central Lusaka, where they sing hymns, spirituals and a substantial dose of European baroque and classical music, always accompanied by the organ. Nothing in their church work would have prepared them for the disciplines of renaissance singing – tuning between themselves without accompaniment and singing long legato melodies in counterpoint – as opposed to relying on an underlying rhythmic impulse. They adapted wonderfully well.

The concert programme followed a pattern which has become usual outside the Western concert-halls for a cappella events: local folk or religious music interspersed with renaissance items. In this case the local music ranged from Naja kwako to Mangwani M’pulele which, in Mike Brewer’s dazzling arrangement, has so many cross-rhythms that even the composers of the Ars Subtilior would have wondered what was going on. Midway between the two came Tippett’s Negro Spirituals from A Child of Our Time, which was performed by these singers with the deliberate intention of showing one or two English choirs how Tippett’s music benefits from an African sense of rhythm. Then came the Byrd Mass, his Ave verum and Tallis’s Salvator mundi.

Rhythm is the innate talent of these singers, which makes the measured and undemonstrative back-beat of polyphony all the more unfamiliar to them. Perhaps we associate their native music-making with Gospel songs, though these are largely an import from the American south. The music one hears on the streets is that of whole groups of people sitting together, often in the back of pick-up trucks, singing in harmony to percussion instruments. The musicians of the New Apostolic Church, led by Simon Kalommo, are currently engaged in putting together a new hymn-book, which will appear both as something for local use, and as part of a pan-African project involving all the neighbouring countries. It is hoped that this will set a new, specifically African standard for congregational singing, rather in the way the New English Hymnal did for the Anglicans a century ago. All the hymns are being newly composed, with the defining characteristic that the music, published with the words, will not involve intricate part-writing but exciting rhythms. When I guessed that the proliferation of languages in southern Africa might be a problem, requiring the faithful to sing words they didn’t understand, Simon said it was no different from them having to sing in Latin. Quite so.

Vox Zambezi is under the auspices of the Lusaka Music Society but is the brainchild of Dr Paul Kelly, a gastroentologist at the University Teaching Hospital of Lusaka, the largest hospital in Zambia. As a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow he is engaged in research as much as practice, though in a country like this every doctor is needed in the consulting room. I am not familiar with hospitals, which meant I was unprepared for this one. The worst of it was the children’s malnutrition ward (the hospital doesn’t have an AIDS ward, having decided there is no point). The best was watching Dr Kelly perform an endoscopy on a young female volunteer to understand better why host defences sometimes fail. In his day job, amongst other things Kelly is hoping to challenge the western belief that certain kinds of digestive cancer are more prevalent in industrialised societies than in underdeveloped ones – he has found them in far younger patients than is normal in the west. In the evenings he marshals these singers, sings second bass with them and fixes everything. The next thing he is fixing, after making a recording with me, is a tour to the UK this June with support from the Wingate Foundation. If you would like to hear them sing while they are in the UK, please visit www.voxzambezi.net.

Such initiative in such circumstances is what makes the world revolve, and his colleagues in Vox do realise how lucky they are. When I asked what gave him the idea of starting the group in the first place, he quoted something I have heard several times before in differing contexts: years ago the Registrar of Societies in Zambia declared that classical western music was not for the common people, it was an irrelevance. The poshest version of this kind of high-handed, inverted paternalism that I ever encountered was when the Secretary of Chamber Music New Zealand stood up in front of an Australian audience and declared: ‘New Zealand people do not like early music’. Out of such irritations good things can come.

But the fascinating question to me is why Vox Zambezi, and many groups like them elsewhere in the world, feel it necessary to include renaissance items in their concerts at all. It is as if they feel the need to prove themselves in the currency of an international gold standard, before performing the music which is theirs and which everyone knows they can sing well (or if they can’t, no-one can). For me it is like hearing English spoken fluently amongst people who have their own language, but regularly choose not to use it. If I am representing the modern status of polyphony accurately here, it is an astonishing turn-around from the situation as I found it in 1973. Every music undergraduate then knew that Byrd was Number One Polyphonist; but we didn’t expect to be hearing him sung years later at all four corners of the globe by people for whom Latin is not only dead, but never lived.

This article appeared in the Spectator issue dated 3rd May 2008:

Read Full Post »

Future publications

I am considering a third book. This would take the form of a series of essays, in the nature of jottings, mopping up some of the untied ends which are loose in my head. Here is a possible list of topics:

  • The disconcerting effects of finding that two masterpieces one loved are not what we were told they were. This refers to the reattributing of two eight-voice motets from two composers we knew and respected (Clemens non Papa and Cristobal de Morales) to someone nobody had ever heard of, Thomas Crecquillon. As the years pass I find this has caused more and more unease, despite the fact that the reattribution is almost certainly correct.
  • Commentary on the ‘think-piece’ I did for the BBC about crossover, and my preference for concert-halls over churches, with reference to the ensuing discussion in which I distinguished between the sound and the visuals in the two types of venue. The piece is quoted below, without the discussion.
  • (more…)

Read Full Post »

What We Really Do

My second book, What We Really Do, was published by the Musical Times. It was indeed launched on October 15th 2003 on the occasion of my 50th birthday, and within three weeks of the 30th anniversary of the foundation of the Tallis Scholars, on November 3rd 1973. The book is much more concerned with the thirty years of the group than with my fifty, in support of which it is filled with 30-year’s worth of photographs of us singing and touring. The chapters finally came out as follows:

  • Introduction
  • Chapter One: A history of the Tallis Scholars
  • Chapter Two: A history of Gimell Records
  • Chapter Three: Performing polyphony
  • Chapter Four: At home and abroad, the spread of interest in polyphony account of the different organisations which have invited me to direct them)
  • Chapter Five: On tour (what it’s like to be on the road for many months of the year)
  • Chapter Six: Singers’ ‘argot’ (the special language of our profession)
  • Chapter Seven: Not an interview with Peter Phillips (a spoof but earnest interview with me)
  • Chapter Eight: An extract from the Tallis Scholars Journal Epilogue
  • A complete discography
  • A complete list of all the people who have sung in the Tallis Scholars
  • Index

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers